<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Computer Articles - Internet and Computer News &#187; Mhz Processor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/tag/mhz-processor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk</link>
	<description>This is an archive of the work of Chris Holgate, first published in the weekly Herald Express Click column.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Operating System History</title>
		<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/operating-system-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/operating-system-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkeley Softworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bit Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodore 64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flavours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphical Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphical Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meaningful Conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory Lane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mhz Processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ms Dos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pc Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trip Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Guy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/?p=1402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think the mark of a true geek is someone who can actually partake in a meaningful conversation relating to a technology which was pioneered half a decade before they were even born. This realisation comes after yours truly found himself today discussing the old CP/M Operating System with our web guy and the PC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>I think the mark of a true geek is someone who can actually partake in a meaningful conversation relating to a technology which was pioneered half a decade before they were even born.<span> </span>This realisation comes after yours truly found himself today discussing the old CP/M Operating System with our web guy and the PC techie.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span>The trip down memory lane got me thinking that perhaps it would be nice to remind ourselves of the path we have walked to have become unfortunate enough to end up with Windows as the most popular choice of Operating System.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><strong><span>CP/M</span></strong><span> – Created back in 1976, this command line based Operating System was developed to provide 8-bit computer users with an easier way of managing the most basic of computer functions, as well as installing and programming applications.<span> </span>It would be fair to say that the younger MS-DOS was very closely based on CP/M and indeed many of the Operating System structures and commands were retained.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><strong><span>DOS</span></strong><span> – Of course, there were in fact several different flavours of DOS available from various vendors but MS-DOS was the one that was used by most.<span> </span>Released in 1981, Microsoft continued to develop this Operating System right up until the release of Windows 95, at which point it was phased out.<span> </span>DOS was a command based Operating System without any form of graphical interface which remained popular even after the introduction of Windows due to the fact that not only was it faster and less hardware intensive but also that it was actually required as a base for Windows to run on top of.<span> </span>Up until Windows 95, your computer would load itself in to DOS by default and those that wanted to use Windows would actually have to load it on top of MS-DOS as a secondary Operating System.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><strong><span>GEOS</span></strong><span> – This remarkably compact Graphical Operating System was originally designed for the Commodore 64; a machine with just 64k of RAM and a 1 MHz processor.<span> </span>Released in 1986 by a company called Berkeley Softworks, GEOS went on to become the third fastest selling Operating System in the world at one stage. <span> </span>Despite the ridiculously miniscule system requirements, GEOS was a nippy Operating System which looked very similar to MacOS which ran on a machine costing ten times the price.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><strong><span>OS/2</span></strong><span> &#8211; Originally a joint venture between IBM and Microsoft in 1987, at one point Microsoft publically insisted that OS/2 was the future and technically speaking, it was superior.<span> </span>Microsoft however managed to bundle Windows 3.0 with many new PC’s (a tactic they have been able to continue up through the years) and as such OS/2 become considered an expensive alternative.<span> </span>Unsurprisingly, the marriage between the two companies hit the rocks and despite IBM soldering on until 2001, OS/2 never managed to enjoy the success that Windows had.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;" align="left"><strong><span>AmigaOS</span></strong><span> – I truly think that the Amiga OS deserves to be remembered as one of the most revolutionary Operating Systems in history and to me it represents a remarkable technology that it took years for Windows to catch up with.<span> </span>The AmigaOS which was initially introduced back in 1985 for the Commodore Amiga line of machines and not only was it nippy, stable and incredibly fully featured but it also included support for multitasking; something that we take for granted nowadays but was the holy grail of computing back then.<span> </span>Unfortunately financial issues at Commodore led to bankruptcy which largely resulted in development on the Amiga platform being abandoned.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/operating-system-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commodore Legacy – Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/the-commodore-legacy-%e2%80%93-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/the-commodore-legacy-%e2%80%93-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amiga 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amiga 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atari St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beginning Of The End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bit Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodore 64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodore Amiga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Appearances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Tramiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mhz Processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point In Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Struggle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profit Margins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profound Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week I started talking about the history of the now bankrupt computer manufacturer Commodore; a company that undeniably had a profound effect on the IT industry. </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">We left off last week after talking about the Commodore 64. This was a machine priced so aggressively that, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Last week I started talking about the history of the now bankrupt computer manufacturer Commodore; a company that undeniably had a profound effect on the IT industry.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">We left off last week after talking about the Commodore 64.<span> </span>This was a machine priced so aggressively that, along with bringing down the cost of computing to the home user, also marked the departure from the market place of several high profile computer companies.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Despite Commodore gaining a large market share during this period the board of directors didn’t agree with the slashing of prices and profit margins.<span> </span>This sparked a power struggle which ended with the departure of Commodores founder, Jack Tramiel who later started his own company along with a number of key Commodore loyalists. <span> </span>A year later Tramiel purchased the Consumer Division of Atari who one of Commodores most high profile rivals at the time.<span> </span>This situation was made worse as Tramiel began recruiting Commodore employees which resulted in several court appearances over theft of trade secrets allegations. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The remaining Commodore management was left to salvage the company and did so by buying a small company known as Amiga who had a strong interest in developing a 16-bit computer.<span> </span>In 1985 Commodore released the Amiga 1000; a fantastic piece of equipment at the time<span> </span>which boasted a 7 MHz processor and 256kb of RAM.<span> </span>Unfortunately the Amiga 1000 was outside the budget of many home users which is a shame when you consider the price point of the Commodore 64 was so low that it made computing accessible to all. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The Amiga 1000 went head to head with the Atari ST and both machines secured a pretty much equal market share until Commodore went on to release the Amiga 500 in 1987.<span> </span>This machine was released at a much more accessible price to the average home user and as such outsold the Atari ST 1.5 to 1 in the United States.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Whilst Commodores fortunes were fairly strong at this point in time the company was now facing the beginning of the end; the reasons for this downfall were numerous and in hindsight seem obvious.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Whilst previous machines such as the C64 had enjoyed a large amount of mass media advertising that the current management were reluctant to repeat, Commodore also began to favour authorised resellers rather than mass outlets such as supermarkets and toy stores that they had exploited in the past.<span> </span>These two factors alone meant that the machines weren’t in the public eye and when the market began becoming saturated with PC’s and Apple Macs in the late 1980’s there seemed little reason to choose an Amiga.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The technology also failed to keep up with the advances that were being made in the PC market and in some instances the company released computers that were actually a step back from what they were previously offering. <span> </span>The Amiga 600 for example which was released in 1992 didn’t offer any real improvements on the A500 which was released 5 years earlier.<span> </span>In reality there were actually several disadvantages to the A600 such as the absence of a numeric keypad and the industry standard SCSI functionality which many A500 users appreciated.<span> </span>The processor was exactly the same speed and the only noticeable improvement was that the machine included a little more memory.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Commodore also released several consumer related products which simply weren’t in demand at the time; the CDTV and CD32 home entertainment systems are just two examples.<span> </span>These were commercial failures for the company which never received any significant market share.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The final nail in the coffin came when software developers began moving away from the Amiga in favour of the PC and Apple Mac.<span> </span>There simply was no reason for a consumer to choose an Amiga system and with sales floundering, Commodore eventually declared bankruptcy on 29<sup>th</sup> April 1994.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Whilst the twilight years of this company were ultimately very disappointing, the advances made in the early years to make home computing more enjoyable and affordable will be remembered in IT history forever.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/the-commodore-legacy-%e2%80%93-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

