<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Computer Articles - Internet and Computer News &#187; Mozilla Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/tag/mozilla-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk</link>
	<description>This is an archive of the work of Chris Holgate, first published in the weekly Herald Express Click column.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/microsoft-office-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/microsoft-office-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64 Bit Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta Test Version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flagship Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infopath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Office Suite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onenote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed Increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starter Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word Excel Powerpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Works Suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite it being the second most used application on my work computer (behind the Mozilla Firefox browser), it’s still impossible for me to get excited about a new edition of the Microsoft Office suite.</p> <p>With the final release due in a couple of months, Microsoft have provided a beta test version of Office 2010 that’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite it being the second most used application on my work computer (behind the Mozilla Firefox browser), it’s still impossible for me to get excited about a new edition of the Microsoft Office suite.</p>
<p>With the final release due in a couple of months, Microsoft have provided a beta test version of Office 2010 that’s free for members of the public to download.  The beta test version will run unhindered until October 2010 at which point users must decide whether they wish to purchase the final release or have it removed from their hard drive.</p>
<p>For the costs involved the majority of home users may still be better off with the free OpenOffice Suite (www.openoffice.org) as it should provide all the features you are likely to need at no cost.  This having been said, the Office Suite has remained a popular flagship product over the years due to business users often requiring a specific function or application only present in the Microsoft offering.  I, for example, use Outlook on a regular basis and haven’t yet found an alternative that suits my needs.</p>
<p>Having not been the biggest fan of Office 2007 (especially the ‘ribbon’ interface discussed in the past) I wasted no time downloading the 64-bit professional version of the beta to put it through its paces.  I have now been using it for a couple of days it does appear notably faster than Office 2007 and certainty incredibly stable.  The speed increase could easily be attributed to the fact that a 64-bit version of the application is now available to run on modern 64-bit computers.</p>
<p>Office Professional 2010 includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, InfoPath, OneNote, Outlook, Access and Publisher.  The home edition (also currently available in beta) includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and OneNote.  After the official release, computer manufacturers may choose to bundle new machines with a starter edition of Office which includes just Excel and Word; this version of Office will replace the aging Microsoft Works Suite.</p>
<p>Although the ribbon interface remains, it is certainly a lot clearer than that provided with Office 2007; the confusing Office orb has been replaced with the familiar file menu, there are fewer distracting borders, a neutral colour scheme and most importantly it is customisable to the users individual tastes.  The applications look and behave like a ‘family’ now and have become more intuitive to use as a result of the more refined user interface.</p>
<p>An important new feature due for release in the final version but missing from the beta is the ‘Web Apps’ which will extend the Office functionality to a compatible web browser.  Very similar in form to Google Docs, Office Web Apps allows users to collaborate, edit and share Office documents online.  This is an incredibly important new feature that has no doubt come about due to the success of Google Docs and one that I would like to field test when complete.</p>
<p>This article isn’t long enough to go in to details about minor new features so I will summarise by observing that the changes made from Office 2007 to Office 2010 are evolutionary rather than revolutionary; very much in the same way that Windows 7 was an evolutionary change compared with Vista.  Excluding the Web Apps there is nothing substantially new however the minor improvements are certainly welcome as is the chance to road test a new piece of software completely free of charge for a year.</p>
<p>Users interested in downloading the beta version of Office 2010 should visit www.microsoft.com/office/2010 to get their hands on a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/microsoft-office-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Wars #2</title>
		<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/browser-wars-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/browser-wars-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compact Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foothold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monopoly Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mouse Gestures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smaller Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Operating System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We started last week by looking at the initial browser wars of the mid to late 1990’s which saw Microsoft triumphing over a very prolific company of the time, Netscape. For a long time Netscape enjoyed a huge share of the browser market before Microsoft developed Internet Explorer, gave it away for free and bundled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">We started last week by looking at the initial browser wars of the mid to late 1990’s which saw Microsoft triumphing over a very prolific company of the time, Netscape.<span> </span>For a long time Netscape enjoyed a huge share of the browser market before Microsoft developed Internet Explorer, gave it away for free and bundled it with their Windows Operating System.<span> </span>Netscape didn’t last long and even to this day the actions of Microsoft are the subject of many debates, not to mention court cases, concerning allegations over restriction of competition and the abuse of a monopoly power.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Microsoft, however, got complacent and left a massive gap between releasing Internet Explorer 6 in 2001 and Internet Explorer 7 in 2006.<span> </span>This left a void which allowed more advanced and capable browsers to get a foothold in the market, resulting in a second series of browser wars.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Despite Internet Explorer still being an integral part of Windows, products by much smaller companies are currently enjoying a large amount of the market share amongst Internet users.<span> </span>This week we’re going to take a look at some of the alternatives and how they’re facing up to the competition.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8.5pt; font-family: &quot;MS Shell Dlg 2&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Mozilla Firefox</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The market share of Firefox has increased steadily since it was first released just over three years ago and it now has an estimated 16% of the browser market.<span> </span>Those who regularly read this column will know that it is presently my browser of choice due to the speed and compact nature of the product coupled with an extensive list of features.<span> </span>Like all good applications it is free of charge so download a copy now at <a href="http://www.firefox.com/">www.firefox.com</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Opera</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">First released publically in 1996, Opera is certainly one of the more established browsers currently participating in the browser wars.<span> </span>Considered to be possibly one of the most pioneering, Opera has had support for technologies such as tabbed browsing and mouse gestures for years.<span> </span>Unfortunately the browser religiously follows web standards and as such many websites simply don’t display as you would expect them to.<span> </span>Rather unfairly this browser currently holds just an estimated 1% of the browser market and more awareness is needed if Opera is going to become a serious contender.<span> </span>Download Opera free of charge by visiting <a href="http://www.opera.com/">www.opera.com</a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Internet Explorer</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">This is the browser that most users will be familiar with as it is the one built in to the Windows Operating System.<span> </span>Internet Explorer 6 was a dinosaur and was five years old by the time it was replaced in late 2006 by Internet Explorer 7.<span> </span>The latest version has made up for lost time as it now includes standard modern day features such as tabbed browsing and phishing support.<span> </span>The browser is, in my opinion, extremely bloated so if you have a little time on your hands then download the latest version from <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/ie7/">www.microsoft.com/ie7/</a> or by performing a Windows update.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Apple Safari</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">This browser has been running on Mac machines since 2003 and just recently Apple have released a version for Windows.<span> </span>Although Safari does have an overall market share of approximately 5% I’m not sure any of this can realistically be attributed to the new Windows version of the browser.<span> </span>Whilst I welcome Safari in to the fold, the Windows version is in my eyes buggy, doesn’t perform as expected and is unnecessarily large.<span> </span>With such competent alternatives, future versions of Safari will have to be a good deal better in order to gain any chance of gaining market penetration.<span> </span>Download Safari free by heading to <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">www.apple.com/safari/</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Netscape Navigator</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">I appreciate that I have already stated that Netscape were beaten in the first browser war, however the broken company was purchased at the time by AOL who up until now have done relatively little with the technology and every version of Navigator until now has been lacklustre.<span> </span>The latest version doesn’t break any major milestones in browser development, but it is far superior to its predecessor and has the potential to do well.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">With just 0.5% of market share Netscape are going to have to do something special to allow Navigator rise from the ashes and become a potential contender, but in this market anything is possible.<span> </span>Download a copy free at <a href="http://browser.netscape.com/">http://browser.netscape.com</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/browser-wars-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Thunderbird</title>
		<link>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/mozilla-thunderbird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/mozilla-thunderbird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti Spam Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finished Version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loyal User]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail Client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Equivalent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Outlook 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Thunderbird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plug Ins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Several Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stable Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months I’ve mentioned the Mozilla Firefox browser several times because it is a worthy alternative to Internet Explorer not least because as well as being free it also is in my opinion a faster and more stable browser than the Microsoft equivalent.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Over the past few months I’ve mentioned the Mozilla Firefox browser several times because it is a worthy alternative to Internet Explorer not least because as well as being free it also is in my opinion a faster and more stable browser than the Microsoft equivalent.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">It seems only natural then that I should digress and discuss the e-mail client available from the same people so it would compliment Firefox perfectly.<span> </span>I would probably pitch Mozilla Thunderbird as a viable alternative to Outlook Express as to be honest the product isn’t feature rich enough to compete on a level playing field with the expensive Microsoft Outlook 2003.<span> </span>Such a comment isn’t an insult to the programmers as I think it would be unreasonable to expect a free 5.8mb download to compete against a program that is dozens of times its size and comes as part of an expensive office suite.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The main advantage to Thunderbird over Outlook Express is that it contains a powerful anti-spam filter that is integrated into the program.<span> </span>This feature alone will be enough to convince a large number of people to make the switch as every week my inbox is filled with people asking my advice on how to get a usually poor anti-spam program installed on their machine.<span> </span>When you consider that many anti-spam solutions cost money then it could be a cheaper option to change your entire e-mail program to the free Mozilla Thunderbird as opposed to trying to get anti spam integration with your existing one.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">As many of you will know the Mozilla suite of programs are ‘Open Source’ and this means that anybody can download the original code and improve/add to it with a view of their changes making it into a finished version of the product.<span> </span>One advantage to making programs in this fashion is that often you collect a loyal user base who are happy to spend their time working on improvements.<span> </span>As well as changes to the program itself, these improvements can also be accommodated into Thunderbird as a ‘plug-ins’.<span> </span>Whilst the core version of Thunderbird is relatively small you can then add features that you require via plug ins to add functionality such as the Mozilla calendar or perhaps you’d prefer several new custom tool bars.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">The look and feel of Thunderbird is relatively minimalist and easy on the eye but the layout can be largely customized to your own taste or even changed completely by loading up a new ‘skin’ for the program &#8211; such skins are often created by other users and available online to download for free.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">An especially nice feature that I noticed is the ability to restrict the download of messages over a certain size.<span> </span>I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had a good chuckle watching a user on a slow 56k connection be unable to view any of their e-mail as Outlook Express is busy downloading a 50mb file that was sent to them by a relative who has broadband.<span> </span>If the user cancels the download then all that happens is next time they try and download their e-mail is that the entire process starts again from scratch – More often than not they’ll spend 2 hours downloading a rubbish program which is then instantly deleted.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">When composing an e-mail Thunderbird has full support for HTML messages as well as the ability to add emoticons (smilies and the like) to messages.<span> </span>Incoming e-mail can be downloaded as either plain text or formatted HTML and the program has the ability to view RSS feeds without any additional software.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%;">Possibly one of the most important features of the program is the import feature.<span> </span>The first time you run Thunderbird it will ask you if you want to import all your messages and settings from another mail client such as Outlook Express.<span> </span>Just say ‘yes’ and the program will quite happily take all the information it needs from your previous mail client before asking you if you then want to make it the default.<span> </span>Once you are happy that Thunderbird is for you then just delete your previous mail client and begin the experience of spam free and speedy e-mail.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.computerarticles.co.uk/mozilla-thunderbird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

